Notes on Complex Analysis
Export PDFGitHub

§13.1 Analytic Function Elements

13.1 Analytic Function Elements

Definition 13.1.1.

An (analytic) function element is a pair (𝑓,𝑈), where 𝑈⊆ℂ is an open region and 𝑓 is a holomorphic function on 𝑈.

Analytic elements serve as local representations of analytic functions. The process of extending these elements is formalized through analytic continuation. In the definition above for a function element, we let 𝑈 be an arbitrary region. However, it is often more practical to consider the explicit case where 𝑈 is a disk.

By the Identity Theorem (Theorem 3.3.3Theorem 3.3.3Theorem 3.3.3), such continuations are unique; if (𝑓1,𝑈1) and (𝑓2,𝑈2) are analytic elements with 𝑈1∩𝑈2≠⌀, and 𝑓1≡𝑓2 on 𝑈1∩𝑈2, then they are direct analytic continuations of each other. The combined function:

𝑓̃(𝑧)={𝑓1(𝑧)if𝑧∈𝑈1,𝑓2(𝑧)if𝑧∈𝑈2∖𝑈1,

is holomorphic on 𝑈1∪𝑈2.

The most straightforward method of the derivation of analytic continuations uses power series. Let 𝑓(𝑧)=∑𝑛=0∞𝑐𝑛(𝑧−𝑧0)𝑛 have radius of convergence 𝑅>0 (by Theorem 2.3.4Theorem 2.3.4Theorem 2.3.4). For 𝑧1∈𝐷(𝑧0,𝑅), we can expand 𝑓 at 𝑧1:

𝑓(𝑧)=∑𝑘=0∞𝑓(𝑘)(𝑧1)𝑘!(𝑧−𝑧1)𝑘.

Let 𝜌 be the radius of convergence of this series. Then:

𝜌≥𝑅−|𝑧1−𝑧0|.

If 𝜌>𝑅−|𝑧1−𝑧0|, then 𝑓 extends analytically to 𝐷(𝑧0,𝑅)∪𝐷(𝑧1,𝜌). In the case that 𝜌=𝑅−|𝑧1−𝑧0|, the disks 𝐷(𝑧0,𝑅) and 𝐷(𝑧1,𝜌) are tangent at a point 𝜁0. Here, 𝜁0 is a singularity, and 𝑓 cannot be continued beyond 𝜁0.

Theorem 13.1.2.

Let 𝑓(𝑧)=∑𝑛=0∞𝑐𝑛(𝑧−𝑧0)𝑛 have radius of convergence 𝑅>0. Then 𝜕𝐷(𝑧0,𝑅) contains at least one singularity of 𝑓.
Proof.

Assume 𝑓 can be analytically continued from every 𝜁∈𝜕𝐷(𝑧0,𝑅). Then for each 𝜁, there exists 𝑟𝜁>0 and a holomorphic 𝑓𝜁 on 𝐷(𝜁,𝑟𝜁) agreeing with 𝑓 on 𝐷(𝜁,𝑟𝜁)∩𝐷(𝑧0,𝑅).

The disks {𝐷(𝜁,𝑟𝜁)}𝜁∈𝜕𝐷(𝑧0,𝑅) cover 𝜕𝐷(𝑧0,𝑅). Then from compactness and the Heine–Borel Theorem (Theorem 1.1.9Theorem 1.1.9Theorem 1.1.9), the cover of disks admits a finite subcover {𝐷(𝜁𝑘,𝑟𝑘)}𝑘=1𝑛. Hence, ∃𝜌>0 such that 𝐴={𝑧:𝑅−𝜌≤|𝑧−𝑧0|≤𝑅+𝜌}⊂𝑉, where we let 𝑉=⋃𝑘=1𝑛𝐷(𝜁𝑘,𝑟𝑘).

Define Φ:𝑉→ℂ by Φ(𝑧)=𝑓𝜁𝑘(𝑧) if 𝑧∈𝐷(𝜁𝑘,𝑟𝑘). This is well-defined: If 𝑧∈𝐷(𝜁𝑖,𝑟𝑖)∩𝐷(𝜁𝑗,𝑟𝑗), then 𝐷(𝜁𝑖,𝑟𝑖)∩𝐷(𝜁𝑗,𝑟𝑗)∩𝐷(𝑧0,𝑅)≠⌀, and 𝑓𝜁𝑖≡𝑓𝜁𝑗≡𝑓 there. By the Identity Theorem (Theorem 3.3.3Theorem 3.3.3Theorem 3.3.3), 𝑓𝜁𝑖≡𝑓𝜁𝑗 on 𝐷(𝜁𝑖,𝑟𝑖)∩𝐷(𝜁𝑗,𝑟𝑗).

Since Φ is holomorphic on 𝑉 and agrees with 𝑓 on 𝐷(𝑧0,𝑅)∩𝑉, the function:

𝑓̃(𝑧)={𝑓(𝑧)if𝑧∈𝐷(𝑧0,𝑅),Φ(𝑧)if𝑧∈𝑉,

is holomorphic on 𝐷(𝑧0,𝑅)∪𝑉⊇𝐷(𝑧0,𝑅+𝜌), contradicting the maximality of 𝑅. ⁠□

Definition 13.1.3.

A maximal analytic continuation {(𝑓,𝑈)} of an analytic function element (𝑓̃,𝑈̃) is obtained by all possible succesive analytic continuations of (𝑓̃,𝑈̃). The union of every 𝑈 is known as the domain of holomorphy of 𝑓̃. The boundary set 𝜕𝑈 is known as a natural boundary. The continuation defines a function 𝑓, known a global analytic function, which can be multi-valued.

Example 13.1.4.

The series 𝑓(𝑧)=∑𝑛=0∞𝑧𝑛! has 𝔻 as its disk of convergence, and every point on 𝜕𝔻 is a singularity.
Proof.

By Cauchy–Hadamard (Theorem 2.3.5Theorem 2.3.5Theorem 2.3.5), lim sup𝑛→∞|𝑐𝑛|𝑛=1 since 𝑐𝑛=1 if 𝑛=𝑘! and 0 otherwise. Thus, 𝑅=1.

Fix 𝜁∈𝜕𝔻. Suppose 𝑓 extends analytically to a disk 𝐷(𝜁,𝛿). Since exp(2πiℚ) is dense in 𝜕𝔻, there exists 𝜁′=exp(2πi𝑝𝑞)∈𝐷(𝜁,𝛿)∩𝜕𝔻 for coprime integers 𝑝,𝑞. The extension 𝑔 of 𝑓 to 𝐷(𝜁,𝛿) would satisfy:

lim𝑟→1−𝑓(𝑟𝜁′)=𝑔(𝜁′).

However, for 0<𝑟<1:

𝑓(𝑟𝜁′)=∑𝑘=0𝑞−1(𝑟𝜁′)𝑘!+∑𝑘=𝑞∞𝑟𝑘!(𝜁′)𝑘!.

The second summation is unbounded since

∑𝑘=𝑞∞𝑟𝑘!(𝜁′)𝑘!=∑𝑘=𝑞∞𝑟𝑘!>∑𝑘=𝑞𝑁𝑟𝑘!>(𝑁−𝑞+1)𝑟𝑁!

for any integer with 𝑁>𝑞. Hence, as 𝑟→1−, ∑𝑘=𝑞∞𝑟𝑘!→∞. Hence, 𝜁 is a singularity. ⁠□

Example 13.1.5.

Show that 𝑓(𝑧)=∑𝑛=0∞𝑧2𝑛 cannot be analytically continued to the outside of 𝔻.
Proof.

Trivially, at 𝑧=1, the series diverges. Therefore, 𝔻 is its convergence disk. Observe that 𝑓(𝑧)=∑𝑛=0∞(𝑧2)2𝑛−1=∑𝑛=0∞(𝑧2)2𝑛+𝑧=𝑓(𝑧2)+𝑧. Hence, we have

𝑓(𝑧)=𝑓(𝑧2)+𝑧=𝑓(𝑧4)+𝑧2+𝑧=𝑓(𝑧8)+𝑧4+𝑧2+𝑧⋯,
which diverges at each 𝑧2,𝑧4,𝑧8,…=1. The solutions form a dense set in 𝜕𝔻. By the same reasoning as Example 13.1.4Example 13.1.4Example 13.1.4, 𝑓 cannot be analytically continued to the outside of 𝔻. ⁠□

Example 13.1.6.

Let Log(𝑧) denote the principal branch of log(𝑧), with −π<Arg(𝑧)≤π. The analytic function elements

(Log,𝐷(1,1))and(Log+2πi,𝐷(1,1))
are analytic continuations of each other.

Example 13.1.7.

Show that the analytic functions defined by the series 𝑓(𝑧)=∑𝑛=0∞𝛼𝑛𝑧𝑛 and 𝑓̃(𝑧)=∑𝑛=0∞(𝛼−1)𝑛𝑧𝑛(1−𝑧)𝑛+1 are analytic continuations of each other.
Proof.

The analytic function element (𝑓,𝐷(0,|1𝛼|)) can be directly continued to the analytic function element (𝑧↦11−𝛼𝑧,ℂ∖{1𝛼}). The function element (𝑓̃,𝐷(0,1−𝑧𝛼−1)) can be analytically continued to

(𝑧↦1(1−𝑧)(1−𝑧𝛼−𝑧1−𝑧),ℂ∖{1,1𝛼})=(𝑧↦11−𝛼𝑧,ℂ∖{1,1𝛼}),
which is a direction analytic continuation of (𝑧↦11−𝛼𝑧,ℂ∖{1𝛼}). Therefore, 𝑓 and 𝑓̃ are analytic continuations of each other. ⁠□

In Example 13.1.6Example 13.1.6Example 13.1.6, we showed that two analytic function elements can on the same domain can be analytic continuations even if they do not agree on the entire domain. In this case, the two elements are on different branches of the function. Hence, depending on the chain of function elements chosen, we may obtain two different analytic function elements that have the same domain.

This is a common issue when it comes to the problem of analytic continuation. This question of non-ambiguity can be explained by planar topology; specifically the concept of homotopy. We will now introduce the concept of analytic continuation along a given curve.