Notes on Complex Analysis
Export PDFGitHub

§2.2 Complex Differentiation

2.2 Complex Differentiation

For 𝑈⊆ℂ and a complex function 𝑓:𝑈→ℂ, 𝑓(𝑧) is complex differentiable at 𝑧∈𝑈 if the following limit exists, regardless of the direction Δ𝑧 approaches 0 from:

limΔ𝑧→0𝑓(𝑧+Δ𝑧)−𝑓(𝑧)Δ𝑧.

We can consider 𝑓(𝑧) to be a bivariate function 𝑓(𝑥,𝑦) for 𝑧=𝑥+i𝑦. Two main cases we are concerned with are when Δ𝑧 approaches 0 from the real and imaginary axes:

limΔ𝑧→0Δ𝑧∈ℝ𝑓(𝑧+Δ𝑧)−𝑓(𝑧)Δ𝑧=limΔ𝑧→0Δ𝑧∈ℝ𝑓(𝑧+iΔ𝑧)−𝑓(𝑧)iΔ𝑧.

Expressing 𝑓(𝑧) as 𝑓(𝑥,𝑦)=𝑢(𝑥,𝑦)+i𝑣(𝑥,𝑦),

limΔ𝑧→0Δ𝑧∈ℝ𝑓(𝑧+Δ𝑧)−𝑓(𝑧)Δ𝑧=limΔ𝑧→0Δ𝑧∈ℝ𝑓(𝑥+Δ𝑧,𝑦)−𝑓(𝑥,𝑦)Δ𝑧=𝜕𝑢𝜕𝑥+i𝜕𝑣𝜕𝑥,

and

limΔ𝑧→0Δ𝑧∈ℝ𝑓(𝑧+iΔ𝑧)−𝑓(𝑧)iΔ𝑧=−ilimΔ𝑧→0Δ𝑧∈ℝ𝑓(𝑥,𝑦+Δ𝑧)−𝑓(𝑥,𝑦)Δ𝑧=𝜕𝑣𝜕𝑦−i𝜕𝑢𝜕𝑦.

By comparing the real and imaginary parts, we obtain necessary conditions for complex differentiability:

𝜕𝑢𝜕𝑥=𝜕𝑣𝜕𝑦and𝜕𝑣𝜕𝑥=−𝜕𝑢𝜕𝑦(2.2.1)

By multiplying the second equation by i and adding it to the first, we obtain the equivalent form

𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑥=−i𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑦.(2.2.2)

The identities (2.2.1)(2.2.1)(2.2.1) and (2.2.2)(2.2.2)(2.2.2) are known as the Cauchy–Riemann equations.

Although this condition is necessary, it is not sufficient. Consider the function

𝑓(𝑧)=|ℜ𝔢(𝑧)ℑ𝔪(𝑧)|.

Let 𝑧=𝑥+i𝑦, 𝑥=𝛼𝑡, and 𝑦=𝛽𝑡. Then

lim𝑧→0𝑓(𝑧)−𝑓(0)𝑧−0=lim𝑧→0𝑓(𝑧)𝑧=lim𝑡→0|𝛼𝛽𝑡2|𝛼𝑡+i𝛽𝑡=|𝛼𝛽|𝛼+i𝛽.

The derivative along 𝛼=1, 𝛽=0, or the real axis, vanishes. Along 𝛼=0, 𝛽=1, or the imaginary axis, it also vanishes. However, the limit is different for any other pair of 𝛼 and 𝛽, and hence for other directions of approach.

Definition 2.2.1 (Holomorphy).

A function 𝑓:𝑈→ℂ is said to be holomorphic at 𝑧0∈𝑈 if it is complex differentiable on a neighborhood of 𝑧0. If 𝑓(𝑧) is holomorphic for every point in an open connected set 𝑈, then it is said to be holomorphic over 𝑈. A function is holomorphic over a compact set 𝐾 if it is holomorphic on a neighborhood of 𝐾.

Weierstrass provided the following classification:

Definition 2.2.2.

A function is entire if it is holomorphic over ℂ.

For the purpose of the following contents, a region or domain will denote a nonempty, open, connected subset of the complex plane.

Theorem 2.2.3.

Let 𝑈⊆ℂ be open, and let 𝑓:𝑈→ℂ be a function. Then 𝑓 is holomorphic on 𝑈 iff 𝑓∈𝐶1(𝑈) and satisfies the Cauchy–Riemann equations.
Proof.

The first part is to prove that any holomorphic function on 𝑈 has continuous first-order partial derivatives in 𝑈. This requires an argument that will be covered later, specifically in Section 3.2Section 3.2Section 3.2, which states that the complex derivative of any holomorphic function is also holomorphic over the region.

For the second part, let 𝑓(𝑧)=𝑓(𝑥,𝑦)=𝑢(𝑥,𝑦)+i𝑣(𝑥,𝑦). Assume that 𝑢,𝑣∈𝐶1({𝑧0}) and satisfy the Cauchy–Riemann equations at 𝑧0=𝑥0+i𝑦0. Let

𝛼=𝜕𝑢𝜕𝑥(𝑥0,𝑦0)=𝜕𝑣𝜕𝑦(𝑥0,𝑦0),𝛽=𝜕𝑣𝜕𝑥(𝑥0,𝑦0)=−𝜕𝑢𝜕𝑦(𝑥0,𝑦0).

Then because 𝑢,𝑣∈𝐶1(𝑈) have continuous partial derivatives, ∀𝑥+i𝑦∈𝑈:

𝑢(𝑥,𝑦)−𝑢(𝑥0,𝑦0)=𝛼(𝑥−𝑥0)−𝛽(𝑦−𝑦0)+ℴ︀(|Δ𝑧|),
𝑣(𝑥,𝑦)−𝑣(𝑥0,𝑦0)=𝛽(𝑥−𝑥0)+𝛼(𝑦−𝑦0)+ℴ︀(|Δ𝑧|),

where |Δ𝑧|=Δ𝑥2+Δ𝑦2 and ℴ︀(|Δ𝑧|) denotes a value with higher infinitesimal order to |Δ𝑧|, or that limΔ𝑧→0ℴ︀(|Δ𝑧|)|Δ𝑧|=0. Then letting Δ𝑧=𝑥−𝑥0+i(𝑦−𝑦0),

𝑓(𝑧)−𝑓(𝑧0)=𝛼Δ𝑧+i𝛽Δ𝑧+ℴ︀(|Δ𝑧|)+ℴ︀(|Δ𝑧|),
𝑓(𝑧)−𝑓(𝑧0)𝑧−𝑧0=𝛼+i𝛽+ℴ︀(|Δ𝑧|)|Δ𝑧|⋅|Δ𝑧|Δ𝑧.

Taking the limit as Δ𝑧→0, the high order infinitesimals on the right-hand side vanish, and

limΔ𝑧→0𝑓(𝑧)−𝑓(𝑧0)𝑧−𝑧0=𝛼+i𝛽.□

We will prove later in Section 3.2Section 3.2Section 3.2 that the complex derivative of a holomorphic function 𝑓(𝑧)=𝑢(𝑧)+i𝑣(𝑧) is holomorphic. Under this assumption, 𝑓(𝑧) has continuous second-order partial derivatives, and therefore,

𝜕2𝑢𝜕𝑥𝜕𝑦=𝜕2𝑢𝜕𝑦𝜕𝑥,𝜕2𝑣𝜕𝑥𝜕𝑦=𝜕2𝑣𝜕𝑦𝜕𝑥,

and by the Cauchy–Riemann equations,

𝜕2𝑢𝜕𝑥2=𝜕2𝑣𝜕𝑥𝜕𝑦,𝜕2𝑢𝜕𝑦2=−𝜕2𝑣𝜕𝑦𝜕𝑥,

and

𝜕2𝑣𝜕𝑥2=−𝜕2𝑢𝜕𝑥𝜕𝑦,𝜕2𝑣𝜕𝑦2=𝜕2𝑢𝜕𝑦𝜕𝑥.

Adding the equations,

𝜕2𝑢𝜕𝑥2+𝜕2𝑢𝜕𝑦2=0,𝜕2𝑣𝜕𝑥2+𝜕2𝑣𝜕𝑦2=0.

This general type of equation is known as Laplace’s equation, which is a basic example of an elliptic partial differential equation. Define the operator (the Laplacian)

∇2=𝛁·𝛁=𝜕2𝜕𝑥2+𝜕2𝜕𝑦2.

Definition 2.2.4 (Harmonicity).

For a given region 𝑈⊆ℂ, a real-valued function 𝑢∈𝐶2(𝑈) satisfying Laplace’s equation ∇2𝑢=0 is a harmonic function.

Thus, the real and complex parts of a holomorphic function are harmonic functions.

Letting 𝑥=𝑟cos𝜃, 𝑦=𝑟sin𝜃, the Laplacian is equal to:

∇2=𝜕2𝜕𝑥2+𝜕2𝜕𝑦2=𝜕𝜕𝑥(𝜕𝑟𝜕𝑥𝜕𝜕𝑟+𝜕𝜃𝜕𝑥𝜕𝜕𝜃)+𝜕𝜕𝑦(𝜕𝑟𝜕𝑦𝜕𝜕𝑟+𝜕𝜃𝜕𝑦𝜕𝜕𝜃)=𝜕𝜕𝑥(𝑥𝑟𝜕𝜕𝑟−𝑦𝑟2𝜕𝜕𝜃)+𝜕𝜕𝑦(𝑦𝑟𝜕𝜕𝑟+𝑥𝑟2𝜕𝜕𝜃)=(𝑥𝑟𝜕𝜕𝑟−𝑦𝑟2𝜕𝜕𝜃)(𝑥𝑟𝜕𝜕𝑟−𝑦𝑟2𝜕𝜕𝜃)+(𝑦𝑟𝜕𝜕𝑟+𝑥𝑟2𝜕𝜕𝜃)(𝑦𝑟𝜕𝜕𝑟+𝑥𝑟2𝜕𝜕𝜃)=(cos𝜃𝜕𝜕𝑟−sin𝜃𝑟𝜕𝜕𝜃)(cos𝜃𝜕𝜕𝑟−sin𝜃𝑟𝜕𝜕𝜃)+(sin𝜃𝜕𝜕𝑟+cos𝜃𝑟𝜕𝜕𝜃)(sin𝜃𝜕𝜕𝑟+cos𝜃𝑟𝜕𝜕𝜃)=cos2𝜃𝜕2𝜕𝑟2−cos𝜃sin𝜃(−1𝑟2𝜕𝜕𝜃+1𝑟𝜕2𝜕𝜃𝜕𝑟)−sin𝜃𝑟(−sin𝜃𝜕𝜕𝑟+cos𝜃𝜕2𝜕𝜃𝜕𝑟)+sin𝜃𝑟2(cos𝜃𝜕𝜕𝜃+sin𝜃𝜕2𝜕𝜃2)+sin2𝜃𝜕2𝜕𝑟2+sin𝜃cos𝜃(−1𝑟2𝜕𝜕𝜃+1𝑟𝜕2𝜕𝜃𝜕𝑟)+cos𝜃𝑟(cos𝜃𝜕𝜕𝑟+sin𝜃𝜕2𝜕𝜃𝜕𝑟)+cos𝜃𝑟2(−sin𝜃𝜕𝜕𝜃+cos𝜃𝜕2𝜕𝜃2)=𝜕2𝜕𝑟2+1𝑟2𝜕2𝜕𝜃2+1𝑟𝜕𝜕𝑟.(2.2.3)

Proposition 2.2.5.

Let 𝑈⊆ℂ be open and connected and let 𝑓:𝑈→ℝ be holomorphic. It follows that 𝑓 is constant over 𝑈.
Proof.Since 𝑓(𝑥,𝑦)=𝑢(𝑥,𝑦)+i𝑣(𝑥,𝑦) is real-valued, 𝑣(𝑥,𝑦)≡0 on 𝑈. Then by the Cauchy–Riemann equations on 𝑈, 𝜕𝑢𝜕𝑥=𝜕𝑣𝜕𝑦=0. Similarly, 𝜕𝑢𝜕𝑦=−𝜕𝑣𝜕𝑥=0. Therefore, 𝑓(𝑧)=𝑢(𝑧) is constant. ⁠□