Notes on Complex Analysis
Export PDFGitHub

§8.4 A Spherical Generalization of Normal Families

8.4 A Spherical Generalization of Normal Families

Picard’s Great Theorem requires a more profound concept by generalizing normal families in the one-point compactification of ℂ.

Definition 8.4.1.

Let {𝑓𝑛(𝑧)} be a (not necessarily analytic) complex function sequence on a connected set Ω⊆ℂ. If ∀𝐾⊂Ω compact, ∀𝑅>0, ∃𝑁∈ℕ such that ∀𝑛>𝑁, ∀𝑧∈𝐾, |𝑓𝑛(𝑧)|>𝑅, then 𝑓𝑛⇉∞ locally uniformly spherically on Ω.

When the “locally uniform limit” is taken to be ∞, the condition of 𝜀-closeness is instead replaced by the requirement that the values eventually leave every fixed compact subset of ℂ (the given definition is equivalent to: ∀𝐾⊂Ω compact, ∀𝐿⊂ℂ compact, ∃𝑁∈ℕ such that ∀𝑛>𝑁, ∀𝑧∈𝐾, 𝑓𝑛(𝑧)∉𝐿). In this way, convergence to infinity is treated symmetrically with convergence to finite values by working in the Riemann sphere ℂ̂, where ∞ is simply another accumulation point.

By equipping the extended complex plane ℂ̂ with the spherical metric instead of the Euclidean metric, convergence to ∞ can be treated like convergence to any finite point. In this setting, ∞ is simply another accumulation point, so there is no need to handle it differently from other values.

Let {𝑎𝑛}𝑛∈ℕ⊆ℂ̂ be a sequence. Then we say 𝑎𝑛→𝑎∞ spherically iff ∀𝜀>0, ∃𝑁∈ℕ such that ∀𝑛>𝑁, 𝑑𝜎(𝑎𝑛,𝑎∞)<𝜀, where 𝑑𝜎 is the spherical distance.

Definition 8.4.2.

A family of meromorphic functions ℱ︀ on some Ω⊆ℂ is said to be spherically normal iff every sequence has a locally uniformly spherically convergent subsequence on Ω.

Montel’s Theorem for holomorphically normal families in Theorem 5.2.6Theorem 5.2.6Theorem 5.2.6 can be generalized via the spherical metric by the statement of Marty’s Criterion (Theorem 8.4.6Theorem 8.4.6Theorem 8.4.6).

Definition 8.4.3 (Spherical Derivative).

Let Ω⊆ℂ be an open region or domain. Suppose 𝑓:Ω→ℂ̂ is meromorphic. Then the spherical derivative of 𝑓 is given by

𝑓♯(𝑧)=𝑓∗𝜎(𝑧)=2|𝑓′(𝑧)|1+|𝑓(𝑧)|2

for 𝑓(𝑧)≠∞ and

𝑓♯(𝑧)=lim𝜁→𝑧𝑓♯(𝜁)
otherwise.

Remark.

In certain normalizations (where the Riemann sphere has north pole (0,0,1) and diameter 1), the spherical derivative will instead be defined by 𝑓♯(𝑧)=|𝑓′(𝑧)|1+|𝑓(𝑧)|2

Proposition 8.4.4.

Any linear fractional transformation is spherically uniformly continuous on ℂ.
Proof.

Let 𝜓(𝑧)=𝑎𝑧+𝑏𝑐𝑧+𝑑, where 𝑎𝑑−𝑏𝑐≠0. Then,

𝜓′(𝑧)=𝑎𝑑−𝑏𝑐(𝑐𝑧+𝑑)2.

The spherical distance between two points 𝑤1=𝜓(𝑧1),𝑤2=𝜓(𝑧2) is given by

𝑑𝜎(𝑤1,𝑤2)=inf𝛾∫𝛾𝜓♯(𝑧)|d𝑧|=inf𝛾∫𝛾2|𝑎𝑑−𝑏𝑐(𝑐𝑧+𝑑)2|1+|𝑎𝑧+𝑏𝑐𝑧+𝑑|2|d𝑧|

where 𝛾 joins 𝑧1 and 𝑧2. The spherical distance is bounded by the integral over the Euclidean straight line 𝛾′ joining 𝑧1 and 𝑧2:

𝑑𝜎(𝑤1,𝑤2)≤∫𝛾′2|𝑎𝑑−𝑏𝑐||𝑐𝑧+𝑑|2+|𝑎𝑧+𝑏|2|d𝑧|.

Since 2|𝑎𝑑−𝑏𝑐||𝑐𝑧+𝑑|2+|𝑎𝑧+𝑏|2→0 as 𝑧→∞ and 𝑧↦2|𝑎𝑑−𝑏𝑐||𝑐𝑧+𝑑|2+|𝑎𝑧+𝑏|2∈𝐶(ℂ), it is bounded by some constant 𝑀 on ℂ. Hence, we have

𝑑𝜎(𝑤1,𝑤2)≤𝑀|𝑧1−𝑧2|.

Hence, ∀𝜀>0, ∀|𝑧1−𝑧2|<𝜀𝑀,

𝑑𝜎(𝜓(𝑧1),𝜓(𝑧2))<𝜀.□

Proposition 8.4.5.

Let {𝑓𝑛}𝑛∈ℕ be a sequence of holomorphic functions on a domain Ω⊆ℂ. If 𝑓𝑛⇉𝑓 locally uniformly spherically, then 𝑓 is either holomorphic on Ω or identically ∞.
Proof.

A result analogous to Theorem 2.3.6Theorem 2.3.6Theorem 2.3.6 can be used to show that 𝑓 is spherically continuous. Let 𝑧∈Ω be arbitrary.

  1. If 𝑓(𝑧)≠∞, then by spherical continuity, ∃𝛿>0 such that ∀𝜁∈𝐷(𝑧,𝛿),

    𝑑𝜎(𝑓(𝜁),𝑓(𝑧))<12𝑑𝜎(∞,𝑓(𝑧)).

    Similarly, ∃𝑁∈ℕ such that ∀𝑛>𝑁,

    𝑑𝜎(𝑓(𝜁),𝑓𝑛(𝜁))<12𝑑𝜎(∞,𝑓(𝑧)).

    Hence, we have

    𝑑𝜎(∞,𝑓(𝑧))−𝑑𝜎(𝑓(𝑧),𝑓𝑛(𝜁))>0.

    By the reverse triangle inequality, we have

    𝑑𝜎(∞,𝑓𝑛(𝜁))>0.
    By Weierstrass (Theorem 4.1.1Theorem 4.1.1Theorem 4.1.1), 𝑓 is holomorphic on 𝐷(𝑧,𝛿).
  2. Consider 𝑓(𝑧)=∞. Assume, for the sake of contradiction, 𝑧 is an isolated pole of 𝑓. Hence, ∃𝛿 such that 𝑓 is holomorphic on 𝐷∗(𝑧,𝛿).

    Because each 𝑓𝑛 is holomorphic on 𝐷(𝑧,𝛿), by the Maximum Modulus Principle (Theorem 3.4.2Theorem 3.4.2Theorem 3.4.2), ∀𝑛∈ℕ,

    |𝑓𝑛(𝜁)|≤sup𝜉∈𝜕𝐷(𝑧,𝛿)|𝑓𝑛(𝜉)|∀𝜁∈𝐷(𝑧,𝛿).

    By letting 𝑛→∞, we have

    |𝑓(𝜁)|≤sup𝜉∈𝜕𝐷(𝑧,𝛿)|𝑓(𝜉)|<∞∀𝜁∈𝐷(𝑧,𝛿),

    contradicting the assumption that 𝑓(𝑧)=∞ is an isolated pole. Hence, 𝑧 must be an accumulation of values evaluating to ∞. By spherical continuity, ∃𝛿>0 such that

    𝑑𝜎(𝑓(𝜁),∞)<π2∀𝜁∈𝐷(𝑧,𝛿).

    Similarly, ∃𝑁∈ℕ such that ∀𝑛>𝑁,

    𝑑𝜎(𝑓(𝜁),𝑓𝑛(𝜁))<π2.

    Hence, we have

    π−𝑑𝜎(∞,𝑓𝑛(𝜁))=𝑑𝜎(∞,0)−𝑑𝜎(∞,𝑓𝑛(𝜁))>0.

    By the reverse triangle inequality, we have

    𝑑𝜎(0,𝑓𝑛(𝜁))>0.

    Hence each 1𝑓𝑛 is holomorphic on 𝐷(𝑧,𝛿) and converges locally uniformly spherically to 1𝑓 on 𝐷(𝑧,𝛿). By Weierstrass (Theorem 4.1.1Theorem 4.1.1Theorem 4.1.1), 1𝑓 is holomorphic on 𝐷(𝑧,𝛿) and has zeros that accumulate at 𝑧. By the Identity Theorem, 1𝑓≡0⟹𝑓≡∞ on 𝐷(𝑧,𝛿).

Let 𝑆 be the set of all 𝑧∈Ω such that 𝑓(𝑧) is finite. By the argument above, 𝑆 is open. The complement Ω∖𝑆 then consists of all points where 𝑓(𝑧)=∞. By the argument above, Ω∖𝑆 is also open. Since Ω is connected, by Theorem 3.2.1.19Theorem 3.2.1.19Theorem 3.2.1.19, either 𝑆=⌀ or 𝑆=Ω. In the former case, 𝑓≡∞ on Ω, and in the latter case, 𝑓 is holomorphic on Ω. ⁠□

Theorem 8.4.6 (Marty’s Criterion).

A family of meromorphic functions ℱ︀ on some Ω⊆ℂ is spherically normal iff

{𝑓♯:𝑓∈ℱ︀},
or the family of spherical derivatives, is locally uniformly bounded in Ω.
Proof.

The condition is equivalent to that of

2|𝑓′(𝑧)|1+|𝑓(𝑧)|2≤𝑀∀𝑓∈ℱ︀

for all compact 𝐾⊂Ω, ∀𝑧∈𝐾, where 𝑀 depends only on 𝐾. Under the assumption that this holds, then

𝑑𝜎(𝑓(𝑧1),𝑓(𝑧2))=inf𝛾∫𝛾d𝑠𝜎≤𝑀|𝑧2−𝑧1|∀𝑓∈ℱ︀

where 𝛾 joins 𝑓(𝑧1) and 𝑓(𝑧2) where 𝑧1,𝑧2∈𝐾. Hence, ∀𝜀>0, ∀𝑧1,𝑧2∈𝐾 such that |𝑧1−𝑧2|<𝜀𝑀, 𝑑𝜎(𝑓(𝑧1),𝑓(𝑧2))<𝜀, and hence ℱ︀ is uniformly spherically equicontinuous. Since 𝑑𝜎≤π for any two points by geometry of 𝑆2, ℱ︀ is also uniformly spherically bounded (the compactness of 𝑆2). Then the Arzelà–Ascoli Theorem (Theorem 5.2.4Theorem 5.2.4Theorem 5.2.4) under the spherical metric gives that ℱ︀ is a normal family.

Conversely, assume for the sake of contradiction that ℱ︀ is a normal family such that conclusion is not satisfied. Then, ∃𝐾⊂Ω compact and a sequence {𝑓𝑛}𝑛∈ℕ⊆ℱ︀ such that the sequence

{sup𝑧∈𝐾𝑓𝑛♯(𝑧)}𝑛∈ℕ

tends to ∞ (specifically, suppose that ∀𝑛∈ℕ, sup𝑧∈𝐾𝑓𝑛♯(𝑧)>𝑛). By normality, we may extract a locally uniformly spherically convergent subsequence {𝑓𝑛𝑘}𝑘∈ℕ⊆{𝑓𝑛}𝑛∈ℕ. By Theorem 2.3.6Theorem 2.3.6Theorem 2.3.6 under the spherical metric, the uniform spherical limit of {𝑓𝑛𝑘}𝑘∈ℕ, 𝑓, is spherically continuous on Ω. For every point 𝑧∈Ω, there are two possibilities:

  1. If 𝑓(𝑧)≠∞, then by continuity, ∃𝛿>0 such that ∀𝜁∈𝐷(𝑧,𝛿),

    𝑑𝜎(𝑓(𝜁),𝑓(𝑧))<12𝑑𝜎(∞,𝑓(𝑧)).

    Similarly, ∃𝑁∈ℕ such that ∀𝑘>𝑁,

    𝑑𝜎(𝑓(𝜁),𝑓𝑛𝑘(𝜁))<12𝑑𝜎(∞,𝑓(𝑧)).

    Hence, we have

    𝑑𝜎(∞,𝑓(𝑧))−𝑑𝜎(𝑓(𝑧),𝑓𝑛𝑘(𝜁))>0.

    By the reverse triangle inequality, we have

    𝑑𝜎(∞,𝑓𝑛𝑘(𝜁))>0.

    Hence, the meromorphy of each 𝑓𝑛𝑘 is actually holomorphy. By continuity, 𝑓 is locally uniformly bounded on 𝐷(𝑧,𝛿). Hence, {𝑓𝑛𝑘}𝑘>𝑁 locally uniformly converges on 𝐷(𝑧,𝛿). By a result of Weierstrass (Theorem 4.1.1Theorem 4.1.1Theorem 4.1.1), 𝑓 is holomorphic on 𝐷(𝑧,𝛿) and the sequence {𝑓𝑛𝑘′}𝑘>𝑁 locally uniformly converges to 𝑓′ on 𝐷(𝑧,𝛿).

    By holomorphy of 𝑓′ on 𝐷(𝑧,𝛿2)‾, ∃𝑀′>0 such that sup𝜁∈𝐷(𝑧,𝛿2)‾|𝑓′(𝜁)|<𝑀′. Uniform convergence of {𝑓𝑛𝑘′}𝑘>𝑁 gives the existence of some 𝑁′>𝑁 such that ∀𝑘>𝑁′,

    |𝑓𝑛𝑘′(𝜁)−𝑓′(𝜁)|<1⟹|𝑓𝑛𝑘′(𝜁)|≤𝑀′+1∀𝜁∈𝐷(𝑧,𝛿2)‾.

    Therefore, {𝑓𝑛𝑘′}𝑘>𝑁 is uniformly bounded by

    𝑀=max({𝑀′+1}∪{sup𝜁∈𝐷(𝑧,𝛿2)‾|𝑓𝑛𝑘′(𝜁)|}𝑁<𝑘≤𝑁′)

    on this compact disk. Hence, ∀𝑘>𝑁,

    𝑓𝑛𝑘♯(𝜁)=2|𝑓𝑛𝑘′(𝜁)|1+|𝑓𝑛𝑘(𝜁)|2≤2|𝑓𝑛𝑘′(𝜁)|≤2𝑀∀𝜁∈𝐷(𝑧,𝛿2)⊂𝐷(𝑧,𝛿2)‾.
  2. 𝑓(𝑧)=∞, then by continuity, ∃𝛿>0 such that ∀𝜁∈𝐷(𝑧,𝛿),

    𝑑𝜎(𝑓(𝜁),∞)<π2.

    Similarly, ∃𝑁∈ℕ such that ∀𝑘>𝑁,

    𝑑𝜎(𝑓(𝜁),𝑓𝑛𝑘(𝜁))<π2.

    Hence, we have

    π−𝑑𝜎(∞,𝑓𝑛𝑘(𝜁))=𝑑𝜎(∞,0)−𝑑𝜎(∞,𝑓𝑛𝑘(𝜁))>0.

    By the reverse triangle inequality, we have

    𝑑𝜎(0,𝑓𝑛𝑘(𝜁))>0.

    Hence, each 𝑔𝑛𝑘=1𝑓𝑛𝑘 is holomorphic on 𝐷(𝑧,𝛿). By continuity, 𝑔=1𝑓 is locally uniformly bounded on 𝐷(𝑧,𝛿). It can also be realized that {𝑔𝑛𝑘}𝑘>𝑁 locally uniformly converges on 𝐷(𝑧,𝛿). By a result of Weierstrass (Theorem 4.1.1Theorem 4.1.1Theorem 4.1.1), 𝑔 is holomorphic on 𝐷(𝑧,𝛿) and the sequence {𝑔𝑛𝑘′}𝑘>𝑁 locally uniformly converges to 𝑔′ on 𝐷(𝑧,𝛿).

    By holomorphy of 𝑔′ on 𝐷(𝑧,𝛿2)‾, ∃𝑀′>0 such that sup𝜁∈𝐷(𝑧,𝛿2)‾|𝑔′(𝜁)|<𝑀′. Uniform convergence of {𝑔𝑛𝑘′}𝑘>𝑁 gives the existence of some 𝑁′>𝑁 such that ∀𝑘>𝑁′,

    |𝑔𝑛𝑘′(𝜁)−𝑔′(𝜁)|<1⟹|𝑔𝑛𝑘′(𝜁)|≤𝑀′+1∀𝜁∈𝐷(𝑧,𝛿2)‾.

    Therefore, {𝑔𝑛𝑘′}𝑘>𝑁 is uniformly bounded by

    𝑀=max({𝑀′+1}∪{sup𝜁∈𝐷(𝑧,𝛿2)‾|𝑔𝑛𝑘′(𝜁)|}𝑁<𝑘≤𝑁′)

    on this compact disk. Hence, ∀𝑘>𝑁,

    𝑓𝑛𝑘♯(𝜁)=2|−𝑔𝑛𝑘′(𝜁)𝑔𝑛𝑘(𝜁)2|1+|𝑔𝑛𝑘(𝜁)|−2=2|𝑔𝑛𝑘′(𝜁)||𝑔𝑛𝑘(𝜁)|2+1≤2|𝑔𝑛𝑘′(𝜁)|≤2𝑀,∀𝜁∈𝐷(𝑧,𝛿2).

In essence, for any point 𝑧, there exists an open disk 𝐷𝑧 centered at 𝑧 on which the spherical derivatives 𝑓𝑛𝑘♯ are bounded by some constant 𝑀𝑧 for 𝑘>𝑁𝑧. By Heine–Borel (Theorem 1.1.9Theorem 1.1.9Theorem 1.1.9), there exists a finite collection of disks {𝐷𝑧𝑗}1≤𝑗≤𝑛 that cover 𝐾. Thus, {𝑓𝑛𝑘♯(𝑧)}𝑘>𝑁 is uniformly bounded on 𝐾 by max1≤𝑗≤𝑛𝑀𝑧𝑗, where 𝑁=max1≤𝑗≤𝑛𝑁𝑧𝑗, contradicting the assumption that sup𝑧∈𝐾𝑓𝑛♯(𝑧)>𝑛 for all 𝑛∈ℕ. ⁠□

Theorem 8.4.7 (Fundamental Normality Test).

Let Ω⊆ℂ be a region and suppose that ℱ︀ is a family of holomorphic functions on Ω. If there exist two different points 𝛼,𝛽∈ℂ such that {𝛼,𝛽}∩⋃𝑓∈ℱ︀𝑓(Ω)=⌀, then ℱ︀ must be a spherically normal family.
Proof.

Map 𝛼 and 𝛽 to 0,1 by a linear function 𝜑(𝑧)=𝑧−𝛼𝛽−𝛼. Then the family of holomorphic functions

ℱ︀̃={𝜑∘𝑓:𝑓∈ℱ︀}

omits 0 and 1 for all 𝑧∈Ω.

By Proposition 8.3.5Proposition 8.3.5Proposition 8.3.5, ∃𝛽>0 such that for

𝜌(𝑧)=1+|𝑧|131+|𝑧−1|13|𝑧|56|𝑧−1|56,d𝑠𝜌2=𝜌(𝑧)2|d𝑧|2

as in (8.3.5)(8.3.5)(8.3.5),

𝐾𝜌(𝑧)≤−𝛽∀𝑧∈ℂ∖{0,1}.

Therefore, if we let 𝜇=𝜌𝛽, then

𝐾𝜇=−∇2(log∘𝜇)𝜇2=−∇2(log∘𝜌)𝜌2𝛽=𝐾𝜌𝛽≤−1onℂ∖{0,1}.(8.4.1)

Let 𝜁∈Ω be arbitrary and let 𝑟=𝑟𝜁>0 satisfy 𝐷(𝜁,𝑟𝜁)⊆Ω. By Corollary 8.3.3.1Corollary 8.3.3.1Corollary 8.3.3.1, the pullback of 𝜇 from ℂ∖{0,1} to 𝐷(𝜁,𝑟𝜁)⊆Ω satisfies

𝑓∗𝜇(𝑧)≤𝜆𝑟𝜁(𝑧−𝜁)⟹𝜇(𝑓(𝑧))|𝑓′(𝑧)|≤2𝑟𝜁𝑟𝜁2−|𝑧−𝜁|2

∀𝑧∈𝐷(𝜁,𝑟𝜁),𝑓∈ℱ︀̃. Since ∀𝑤∈ℂ∖{0,1},

𝜎𝜇=21+|𝑤|21+|𝑤|131+|𝑤−1|13|𝑤|56|𝑤−1|56→{0as𝑤→00as𝑤→12|𝑤|−2|𝑤|−43→0as𝑤→∞.

Hence, there exist open neighborhoods 𝑈0,𝑈1,𝑈∞ of 0,1,∞ respectively on which 𝜎𝜇<1. Since 𝜎𝜇∈𝐶(ℂ), by Theorem 1.2.22Theorem 1.2.22Theorem 1.2.22, ∃𝑀′>0 such that 𝜎𝜇<𝑀′ on ℂ∖(𝑈0∪𝑈1∪𝑈∞). Let 𝑀=max(𝑀′,1), and

∴𝜎≤𝑀𝜇onℂ∖{0,1}.

Hence, ∀𝑓∈ℱ︀̃, we have by virtue of (8.4.1)(8.4.1)(8.4.1),

𝑓♯(𝑧)=𝜎∘𝑓(𝑧)|𝑓′(𝑧)|≤𝑀𝜇∘𝑓(𝑧)|𝑓′(𝑧)|≤2𝑟𝜁𝑀𝑟𝜁2−|𝑧−𝜁|2

for any 𝑧∈𝐷(𝜁,𝑟𝜁). Now restricting 𝑧 to 𝐷(𝜁,𝑟𝜁2), we have

|𝑧−𝜁|2<𝑟𝜁24⟹𝑟𝜁2−|𝑧−𝜁|2>3𝑟𝜁24⟹|𝑓♯(𝑧)|<8𝑟𝜁𝑀3𝑟𝜁2=8𝑀3𝑟𝜁.

For any compact 𝐾⊂Ω, the collection of open disks

{𝐷(𝜁,𝑟𝜁2)}𝜁∈𝐾

forms an open cover of 𝐾. Hence, by Heine–Borel (Theorem 1.1.9Theorem 1.1.9Theorem 1.1.9), it admits a finite subcover

{𝐷(𝜁𝑘,𝑟𝜁𝑘2)}1≤𝑘≤𝑛

for some 𝑛∈ℕ. Then {𝑓♯:𝑓∈ℱ︀̃} is uniformly bounded on 𝐾 by

𝑀𝐾=max{8𝑀3𝑟𝜁𝑘:1≤𝑘≤𝑛}

and is thus locally uniformly bounded on Ω. Marty’s Criterion (Theorem 8.4.6Theorem 8.4.6Theorem 8.4.6) gives the normality of ℱ︀̃; since 𝜑 is linear, it follows that ℱ︀ is also normal on Ω. ⁠□

Corollary 8.4.7.1 (Montel–Carathéodory).

Let Ω⊆ℂ be a region and suppose that ℱ︀ is a family of meromorphic functions on Ω. If there exist three different points 𝛼,𝛽,𝛾∈ℂ̂ such that {𝛼,𝛽,𝛾}∩⋃𝑓∈ℱ︀𝑓(Ω)=⌀, then ℱ︀ must be a spherically normal family.
Proof.

Let 𝜑(𝑧)=(𝑧−𝛼)(𝛽−𝛾)(𝑧−𝛾)(𝛽−𝛼) be a Möbius transformation mapping 𝛼,𝛽,𝛾 to 0,1,∞, respectively. Hence, the family of meromorphic functions

ℱ︀̃={𝜑∘𝑓:𝑓∈ℱ︀}

omits 0, 1, and ∞ (and hence each function is holomorphic). By the Fundamental Holomorphic Normality Test (Theorem 8.4.7Theorem 8.4.7Theorem 8.4.7), ℱ︀̃ is normal.

By Proposition 8.4.4Proposition 8.4.4Proposition 8.4.4, ∀𝜀>0, ∃𝛿>0 such that ∀|𝑤1−𝑤2|<𝛿 in ℂ,

𝑑𝜎(𝜑−1(𝑤1),𝜑−1(𝑤2))<𝜀.

Let {𝑓̃𝑛}𝑛∈ℕ be any function sequence in ℱ︀ and let {𝑓̃𝑛𝑘}𝑘∈ℕ be locally uniformly convergent to 𝑓̃ on a compact set 𝐾⊂Ω. Then ∃𝑁∈ℕ such that ∀𝑘>𝑁,

|𝑓̃𝑛𝑘(𝑧)−𝑓̃(𝑧)|<𝛿∀𝑧∈𝐾.

Therefore, ∀𝑧∈𝐾, 𝑘>𝑁, we have

𝑑𝜎(𝜑−1∘𝑓̃𝑛𝑘(𝑧),𝜑−1∘𝑓̃(𝑧))=𝑑𝜎(𝑓𝑛𝑘(𝑧),𝑓(𝑧))<𝜀.

Hence, every sequence 𝑓𝑛 has a locally uniformly spherically convergent subsequence, and the normality of ℱ︀ follows. ⁠□