§12.1 The -Function
12.1 The -Function
Definition 12.1.1.
The Gamma function is defined by
where .By letting where , we have . Notice that for ,
Since is convergent and , then by comparison, the second integral is convergent.
Therefore, is convergent on . It follows that is absolutely convergent on the right half-plane .
Theorem 12.1.2.
The -function is holomorphic on .Proof.
Let be an arbitrary simple, closed, rectifiable curve. By Morera’s Theorem (Theorem 3.2.6), it suffices to show that . We have
where the integral exchange is justified by uniform convergence of on compact subsets of (by the Weierstrass –Test, Theorem 2.3.3). From integration by parts, we obtain
Additionally,
Hence, we have for nonnegative integers, and the -function generalizes the factorial. We also have
Therefore, can derive its analytic continuation via
Since the numerator is holomorphic on and was arbitrary, the analytic continuation of has simple poles at each of . Hence, is meromorphic on .
By (4.5.2), the residue at each pole is equal to
We will now study two representations for the Gamma function.
Theorem 12.1.3 (Gauss).
The Gamma function satisfies
Proof.
Define the sequence of functions
By integration by parts, we have
Let us now analyze the difference
Since
we have
Additionally, since
has zeros at and at , and
evaluates to at and evaluates to
as , attains its maximum of at . For , . From (12.1.5), we have
Moreover, since for ,
it follows that is positive. By (12.1.4), we have
as . From (12.1.3), we have , or (12.1.2) The Weierstrass formula is a direct consequence of the Gauss formula.
Theorem 12.1.4 (Weierstrass).
The reciprocal -function has the entire Weierstrass factorization of
where .Proof.
Since the Gauss formula agrees with (12.1.1) on the right half-plane, the analytic continuation of is unique on the entire complex plane except for the poles at by the Identity Theorem (Theorem 3.3.3). Since
Therefore,
The constant is known as the Euler–Mascheroni constant. For each , , and the integral is bounded by , and hence the integral is convergent. The properties of still largely remain unknown.
By the Weierstrass Factorization Theorem (Theorem 4.4.3.5), if we let and , it follows that
is convergent. Thus, the Weierstrass formula defines an entire function with zeros at each of .
We have two famous identities on the -function:
Theorem 12.1.5 (Euler’s Reflection Formula).
The -function can be analytically continued to the left half-plane with the functional equation of
for .Proof.
By the Weierstrass Formula (Theorem 12.1.4), we have
Since the Weierstrass elementary factors form an absolutely convergent infinite product, we may rearrange its terms. Hence, by Theorem 4.4.5.4, we have
which confirms (12.1.7). Example 12.1.6.
Evaluate .Solution to Example 12.1.6.
By the Reflection Formula (Theorem 12.1.5), we have that
and it follows that as it is positive. Theorem 12.1.7 (Legendre’s Duplication Formula).
For any , we have
Proof.
From Theorem 12.1.3, we have
where the left-hand side is defined since . By expansion of the value, we have
where the last step is derived from Example 12.1.6. The identity above is a special case of the following result:
Theorem 12.1.8 (Gauss Multiplication Theorem).
Suppose . Let . Then we have
The Gamma function as in (12.1.1) is commonly referred to as the Euler Integral of the Second Kind.
Definition 12.1.9 (Beta Function).
The Euler Integral of the First Kind is also known as the Beta function, and is defined by
By a change of variables (by letting ), we derive the symmetry of the Beta function:
The Beta function is commonly treated as an auxiliary function in many cases of integral evaluation due to its connection with the Gamma function:
Theorem 12.1.10.
For any , we have
Proof.
Consider the product . By letting and , we have
Let , , and . Then we have
Example 12.1.11 (MIT Integration Bee 2023 Finals #1).
Evaluate
Solution to Example 12.1.11.
By rewriting the integral, and letting , we have
where the last step recognizes the form of (12.1.10). Theorem 12.1.10 then gives
Lastly, the Reflection Formula (Theorem 12.1.5) gives that
Example 12.1.12.
Evaluate
Proof of Example 12.1.12.
Apply the substitution , and the integral representation to get
The integral switch is justified since the integrand throughout. Consider the integral for
where and . Let the integral in the last expression be a complex function of , more explicitly , defined for .
Notice that the integral maybe written as the difference of two convergent integrals for :
by the reflection formula (Theorem 12.1.5), which derives an analytic continuation of to everywhere in .
One can show by differentiation under the integral sign, that the integral is holomorphic for . The identity theorem (Theorem 3.3.3) then allows the computed cosecant expression to be assigned to :