Notes on Complex Analysis
Export PDFGitHub

§13.3 The Monodromy Theorem

13.3 The Monodromy Theorem

Before we address our main issue, we will first formalize the concept of homotopy. Informally, it is a continuous deformation or “smooth interpolation” between two curves (that lies entirely within a provided set).

Definition 13.3.1.

Let 𝑈⊆ℂ be an open set. Two curves 𝛾1,𝛾2:[0,1]→𝑈 are said to be homotopic if there exists a continuous function 𝐻:[0,1]×[0,1]→𝑈 such that:

  1. 𝐻(0,𝑡)=𝛾1(𝑡) for all 𝑡∈[0,1],
  2. 𝐻(1,𝑡)=𝛾2(𝑡) for all 𝑡∈[0,1].

The function 𝐻 is known as a homotopy between 𝛾1 and 𝛾2.

We are primarily concerned with homotopies with fixed endpoints (under the pretense that 𝛾1(0)=𝛾2(0) and 𝛾1(1)=𝛾2(1)), or that the homotopy 𝐻 satisfies 𝐻(𝑠,0)=𝛾1(0)=𝛾2(0) and 𝐻(𝑠,1)=𝛾1(1)=𝛾2(1) for any 𝑠∈[0,1].

Definition 13.3.2.

Let Ω⊆ℂ be a region and let 𝑈⊆Ω be an open disk centered at 𝑃∈Ω. Suppose (𝑓,𝑈) is an analytic function element. If there is an analytic continuation of (𝑓,𝑈) along any curve 𝛾⊂Ω from 𝑃, then (𝑓,𝑈) has unrestricted continuation in Ω.

As for our question in interest:

Let 𝛾1:[0,1]→ℂ and 𝛾2→ℂ be two curves with the same endpoints (𝛾1(0)=𝛾2(0) and 𝛾1(1)=𝛾2(1)), and let {(𝑓𝑡,𝑈𝑡)}0≤𝑡≤1 and {(𝑓̃𝑡,𝑈̃𝑡)}0≤𝑡≤1 be the unique analytic continuations along 𝛾1 and 𝛾2 respectively. Under what conditions will the terminal analytic function elements be equivalent (when will it be satisfied that 𝑓1≡𝑓̃1 on 𝑈1∩𝑈̃1)?

This question is not necessarily an affirmative. The principal branch logarithm on 𝐷(1,1), when analytically continued on the unit upper semicircle {eπi𝜃}0≤𝑡≤1 and unit lower semicircle {e−πi𝜃}0≤𝑡≤1, yields inequivalent terminal analytic function elements (differing by 2πi). The general answer to the question is given below:

Theorem 13.3.3.

Let Ω⊆ℂ be a region, and suppose 𝑈⊆Ω is a disk centered at 𝑃, and let 𝛾1 and 𝛾2 be two curves in Ω with the same endpoints (𝑃=𝛾1(0)=𝛾2(0) and 𝑄=𝛾1(1)=𝛾2(1)). Let {(𝑓𝑡,𝑈𝑡)}0≤𝑡≤1 and {(𝑓̃𝑡,𝑈̃𝑡)}0≤𝑡≤1 be the unique analytic continuations along 𝛾1 and 𝛾2 respectively. If 𝛾1 and 𝛾2 are homotopic in Ω and (𝑓,𝑈) has unrestricted continuation in Ω, then 𝑓1≡𝑓̃1 on 𝑈1∩𝑈̃1.
Proof.

Let 𝑠 be a fixed value in [0,1] and consider the curve defined by 𝑡↦𝐻(𝑠,𝑡) from 𝑃 to 𝑄. By the unrestricted continuation assumption, there exists an analytic continuation {(𝑓𝑠,𝑡,𝑈𝑠,𝑡)}0≤𝑡≤1 of (𝑓,𝑈) along this curve. In this form, we aim to show that 𝑓0,1≡𝑓1,1 on 𝑈0,1∩𝑈1,1 (we have taken the liberties to denote 𝑓1 by 𝑓0,1 and 𝑓̃1 by 𝑓1,1, with similar notions for 𝑈1 and 𝑈̃1).

Let

𝑆={𝑠∈[0,1]:∀0≤𝜆≤𝑠,𝑓𝜆,1≡𝑓0,1on𝑈𝜆,1∩𝑈0,1∋𝑄}.

Let us fix 𝑠∈𝑆. The analytic continuation {(𝑓𝑠,𝑡,𝑈𝑠,𝑡)}0≤𝑡≤1 along the curve 𝑡↦𝐻(𝑠,𝑡) generates the cover {𝑈𝑠,𝑡}0≤𝑡≤1 of the compact curve {𝐻(𝑠,𝑡)}0≤𝑡≤1. By Heine–Borel (Theorem 1.1.9Theorem 1.1.9Theorem 1.1.9), there exists a finite subcover {𝑈𝑠,𝑡𝑘}𝑘=1𝑛. Then ∃𝜀>0 such that each 𝐷(𝐻(𝑠,𝑡),𝜀)⊆⋃𝑘=1𝑛𝑈𝑠,𝑡𝑘 for all 𝑡∈[0,1]. In fact, we can choose 𝜀 to be

𝜀=min𝑘=1𝑛[dist(𝐻(𝑠,[0,1]),𝜕𝑈𝑠,𝑡𝑘∖⋃𝑗=1𝑛𝑈𝑠,𝑡𝑗)].

It can be verified that dist here is positive since 𝐻(𝑠,[0,1])⊂⋃𝑗=1𝑛𝑈𝑠,𝑡𝑗 (thus both sets are disjoint) and both are compact sets. By continuity, ∀𝑡∈[0,1], ∃𝛿>0 such that ∀𝑠′∈[0,1]∩(𝑠−𝛿,𝑠+𝛿), |𝐻(𝑠,𝑡)−ℎ(𝑠′,𝑡)|<𝜀. By the Heine–Cantor Theorem (Theorem 1.2.26Theorem 1.2.26Theorem 1.2.26), 𝛿 attains a positive infimum, and thus ∃𝛿>0 such that ∀𝑠′∈[0,1]∩(𝑠−𝛿,𝑠+𝛿), ∀𝑡∈[0,1], |𝐻(𝑠,𝑡)−𝐻(𝑠′,𝑡)|<𝜀.

Fix 𝑠′ and 𝑡. By the derived inequality, we have that 𝐻(𝑠′,𝑡)∈𝑈𝑠,𝑡 and therefore, 𝑈̃𝑠′,𝑡=𝐷(𝐻(𝑠′,𝑡),𝜀−|𝐻(𝑠,𝑡)−𝐻(𝑠′,𝑡)|)⊆𝑈𝑠,𝑡. Thus, the analytic function element (𝑓𝑠,𝑡,𝑈̃𝑠′,𝑡) is a direct analytic continuation of (𝑓𝑠,𝑡,𝑈𝑠,𝑡). By constructing analytic function elements similarly for all 𝑡, we obtain an analytic continuation of (𝑓𝑠,0,𝑈̃𝑠′,0) along 𝐻(𝑠′,[0,1]). Because (𝑓𝑠,0,𝑈𝑠,0) and (𝑓𝑠,0,𝑈̃𝑠′,0) are direct analytic continuations of each other, by Lemma 13.2.2Lemma 13.2.2Lemma 13.2.2, the continuations {(𝑓𝑠,𝑡,𝑈̃𝑠′,𝑡)}0≤𝑡≤1 and {(𝑓𝑠′,𝑡,𝑈𝑠′,𝑡)}0≤𝑡≤1 are equivalent. Thus, all elements of (𝑠−𝛿,𝑠+𝛿)∩[0,1] belong in 𝑆, and thus 𝑆 is relatively open in [0,1].

Let {𝑠𝑛}𝑛∈ℕ⊂𝑆 be an arbitrarily chosen convergent sequence accumulating at 𝑠∞. Since there exists an analytic continuation of (𝑓𝑠∞,0,𝑈𝑠∞,0) along the curve 𝐻(𝑠∞,[0,1]), we can use the same argument as before to construct 𝜀 such that each 𝐷(𝐻(𝑠∞,𝑡),𝜀)⊆𝑈𝑠∞,𝑡 and 𝛿 such that ∀𝑠∈[0,1]∩(𝑠∞−𝛿,𝑠∞+𝛿), ∀𝑡∈[0,1], |𝐻(𝑠,𝑡)−𝐻(𝑠∞,𝑡)|<𝜀. By convergence, for sufficiently large 𝑛, |𝑠𝑛−𝑠∞|<𝛿. Hence, there is an analytic continuation

{(𝑓𝑠∞,𝑡,𝐷(𝐻(𝑠𝑛,𝑡),𝜀−|𝐻(𝑠𝑛,𝑡)−𝐻(𝑠∞,𝑡)|))}0≤𝑡≤1

along 𝐻(𝑠𝑛,[0,1]), which is equivalent to {(𝑓𝑠𝑛,𝑡,𝑈𝑠𝑛,𝑡)}0≤𝑡≤1 by Lemma 13.2.2Lemma 13.2.2Lemma 13.2.2 under the same preliminary assumptions as shown previously. By the following logic, 𝑓𝑠∞,1≡𝑓𝑠𝑛,1 on the intersection, and 𝑠∞∈𝑆 and 𝑆 is closed. Hence, by Theorem 3.2.1.19Theorem 3.2.1.19Theorem 3.2.1.19, 𝑆=[0,1]. Thus, ∀0≤𝜆≤1, 𝑓𝜆,1≡𝑓0,1 on 𝑈𝜆,1∩𝑈0,1∋𝑄. ⁠□

Corollary 13.3.3.1.

Let Ω⊆ℂ be simply connected, or that every closed curve in Ω is null-homotopic (homotopic to a constant curve, or a point) in Ω. Let 𝑈⊆Ω be a disk and suppose (𝑓,𝑈) is an analytic function element with unrestricted continuation in Ω. Then ∃!𝑓̃ that is holomorphic on Ω such that 𝑓̃≡𝑓 on 𝑈.

The problems arising from the complex logarithm are now understood specifically as the failure of the homotopy condition. In a set excluding albeit enclosing the origin, such as ℂ∖{0}, curves enclosing the origin are not homotopic to the zero constant curve, and in the complex plane, the logarithm does not admit unrestricted continuation in ℂ since it cannot be continued along any curve passing through the origin.