Notes on Complex Analysis
Export PDFGitHub

§3.5 The Group of Holomorphic Automorphisms on the Unit Disk

3.5 The Group of Holomorphic Automorphisms on the Unit Disk

The following important result can be directly obtained from the Maximum Modulus Principle.

Lemma 3.5.1 (Schwarz).

If 𝑓:𝔻→𝔻 is holomorphic and 𝑓(0)=0, then

|𝑓(𝑧)|≤|𝑧|,|𝑓′(0)|≤1.

Any one of the inequalities becomes equalities iff 𝑓(𝑧) is in the form of 𝑧ei𝜏, where 𝜏∈ℝ. In other words, 𝑓 is a pure rotation.

Proof.

Define the auxiliary function

𝑔(𝑧)={𝑓(𝑧)𝑧if𝑧≠0,𝑓′(0)if𝑧=0.

Because lim𝑧→0𝑓(𝑧)𝑧=𝑓′(0), 𝑔(𝑧) is holomorphic on 𝔻. Since 𝑓 is an automorphism on the open disk, ∀|𝑧|<1, |𝑓(𝑧)|<1. By the Maximum Modulus Principle (Theorem 3.4.2Theorem 3.4.2Theorem 3.4.2), ∀0<𝜀<1, ∀𝑧∈𝐷(0,𝜀),

|𝑔(𝑧)|≤max𝑧𝜀∈𝜕𝐷(0,𝜀)|𝑓(𝑧𝜀)|𝜀<1𝜀.

As 𝜀→1−, we obtain that ∀𝑧∈𝔻, |𝑔(𝑧)|≤1, or that |𝑓(𝑧)|≤|𝑧|. Let 𝑧=0. Then we get |𝑔(0)|=|𝑓′(0)|≤1.

For the sake of the equality condition, assume |𝑓(𝑧)|=|𝑧|. Then |𝑔(𝑧)|≡1 on the unit open disk. By Theorem 3.4.2Theorem 3.4.2Theorem 3.4.2, 𝑔(𝑧)=ei𝜏 where 𝜏∈ℝ and 𝑓(𝑧)=𝑧ei𝜏 on 𝔻.

Next, assume only that |𝑓′(0)|=1. It follows that |𝑔(0)|=1. Since |𝑔(𝑧)|≤1 for all 𝑧∈𝔻, it follows from Theorem 3.4.2Theorem 3.4.2Theorem 3.4.2 that 𝑔 is constant with magnitude 1, or in the form of ei𝜏, where 𝜏∈ℝ is a constant. Consequently, 𝑓(𝑧)=𝑧ei𝜏. ⁠□

To discuss the main topic of this section, we will first introduce the concept of a group.

Definition 3.5.2 (Group).

A group is a nonempty set 𝐺 and a binary operation (we will denote this as ∗) satisfying the four group axioms:

  • Closure: ∀𝑎,𝑏∈𝐺, 𝑎∗𝑏∈𝐺.
  • Associativity: ∀𝑎,𝑏,𝑐∈𝐺, (𝑎∗𝑏)∗𝑐=𝑎∗(𝑏∗𝑐).
  • Identity Element: ∃𝑒∈𝐺 such that ∀𝑎∈𝐺, 𝑎∗𝑒=𝑒∗𝑎=𝑎. Note that 𝑒 is unique; if 𝑒,𝑓∈𝐺 were both identity elements, then 𝑒∗𝑓=𝑓∗𝑒=𝑒=𝑓, and are equal.
  • Inverse Element: ∀𝑎∈𝐺, ∃𝑎−1∈𝐺 such that 𝑎∗𝑎−1=𝑒=𝑎−1∗𝑎, where 𝑒 is the identity element. Note that 𝑎−1 is unique. Assume 𝑏,𝑐 were both inverses of 𝑎. Then, 𝑏=𝑏∗𝑒=𝑏∗(𝑎∗𝑐)=(𝑏∗𝑎)∗𝑐=𝑐, and are equal.

A subgroup 𝐻 of 𝐺 is a subset of 𝐺 that is also a group under the same operation as 𝐺. This relationship is denoted by 𝐻≤𝐺 or 𝐻<𝐺 for proper subgroups.

Group operations are not necessarily commutative. In the case that they are, (specifically if 𝑎,𝑏∈𝐺⟹𝑎∗𝑏=𝑏∗𝑎), then 𝐺 is an abelian group.

If 𝑈⊆ℂ is connected and 𝑓:𝑈→𝑈 is holomorphic on 𝑈 and bijective, 𝑓 is a holomorphic automorphism on 𝑈. The group of holomorphic automorphisms on 𝑈 is denoted by Aut(𝑈), which is the set of all holomorphic automorphisms such as 𝑓, with the operation of composition (𝑓∘𝑔).

First we will show that ∀𝑎∈𝔻,

𝜑𝑎(𝑧)=𝑧−𝑎1−𝑎‾𝑧∈Aut(𝔻).(3.5.1)

Firstly, the function is holomorphic on 𝔻 as |𝑧|≤1, |𝑎‾|<1, the denominator never vanishes. Additionally, 𝜑𝑎(𝑎)=0.

First, we will observe the image of 𝜕𝔻. Let |𝑧|=1. Then,

|𝜑𝑎(𝑧)|=|1𝑧||𝑧−𝑎1𝑧−𝑎‾|=|𝑧−𝑎𝑧‾−𝑎‾|=1.

Therefore, the image of 𝜕𝔻 lies on 𝜕𝔻, and since 𝑓 is holomorphic and non-constant, by the Maximum Modulus Principle (Theorem 3.4.2Theorem 3.4.2Theorem 3.4.2), for any |𝑧|<1, |𝜑𝑎(𝑧)|<1. Therefore, 𝑓 maps 𝔻 to 𝔻. We next aim to show that 𝑓:𝔻→𝔻 is bijective.

Let us first confirm injectivity. For all 𝑧1,𝑧2∈𝔻, we will observe when

𝑧1−𝑎1−𝑎‾𝑧1=𝑧2−𝑎1−𝑎‾𝑧2

is satisfied. It follows that

(𝑧1−𝑎)(1−𝑎‾𝑧2)=(𝑧2−𝑎)(1−𝑎‾𝑧1),𝑧1−𝑎−𝑎‾𝑧1𝑧2+|𝑎|2𝑧2=𝑧2−𝑎−𝑎‾𝑧1𝑧2+|𝑎|2𝑧1.

Then,

|𝑎|2(𝑧2−𝑧1)=𝑧2−𝑧1⟺(|𝑎|2−1)(𝑧2−𝑧1)=0.

Since |𝑎|<1, then |𝑎|2−1≠0, and we get 𝑧2−𝑧1=0. This proves the univalence of 𝜑𝑎(𝑧).

Next, we will solve for the inverse of 𝜑𝑎. Let 𝑧=𝜑𝑎(𝑤)=𝑤−𝑎1−𝑎‾𝑤. Then,

𝑧−𝑎‾𝑧𝑤=𝑤−𝑎⟺𝑤=𝑧+𝑎1+𝑎‾𝑧.(3.5.2)

It follows that 𝜑−𝑎=(𝜑𝑎)−1. Thus 𝜑𝑎 is surjective and a bijective automorphism. It follows that (3.5.1)(3.5.1)(3.5.1) is true. Functions in the form of 𝜑𝑎 (where 𝑎∈𝔻) are known as Möbius transformations, and the group of all such transformations is known as the Möbius transformation group on the unit disk, which is a subgroup of Aut(𝔻). Functions in the form of 𝜌𝜏(𝑧)=𝑧ei𝜏, where 𝜏∈ℝ is constant, form a group known as the rotation group, which is also a subgroup of Aut(𝔻).

Theorem 3.5.3 (The Holomorphic Automorphism Group on 𝔻).

∀𝑓∈Aut(𝔻), 𝑓 is a composition between a Möbius transformation and a rotation. In other words, ∃|𝑎|<1 and ∃𝜏∈ℝ such that

𝑓(𝑧)=𝜑𝑎∘𝜌𝜏(𝑧).
Moreover, all such functions are in Aut(𝔻).
Proof.

Define the auxiliary function

𝜓(𝑧)=𝜑𝑓(0)∘𝑓(𝑧).

It follows that 𝜓∈Aut(𝔻). Furthermore,

𝜓(0)=𝜑𝑓(0)∘𝑓(0)=0.

By the Schwarz Lemma (Lemma 3.5.1Lemma 3.5.1Lemma 3.5.1), |𝜓′(0)|≤1. Since 𝜓−1∈Aut(𝔻) with 𝜓−1(0)=0, |(𝜓−1)′(0)|≤1. Then,

|(𝜓−1)′(0)|=|1𝜓′(𝜓−1(0))|=|1𝜓′(0)|≤1.

Then, |𝜓′(0)|=1, and by the equality statement of Lemma 3.5.1Lemma 3.5.1Lemma 3.5.1,

𝜓(𝑧)=𝑧ei𝜏=𝜌𝜏(𝑧)

for some constant 𝜏∈ℝ, and

𝑓(𝑧)=𝜑𝑓(0)−1∘𝜌𝜏(𝑧).

By (3.5.2)(3.5.2)(3.5.2), it follows that

𝑓(𝑧)=𝜑−𝑓(0)∘𝜌𝜏(𝑧).

⁠□

As a direct consequence of Theorem 3.5.3Theorem 3.5.3Theorem 3.5.3, we have the following result:

Lemma 3.5.4 (Schwarz–Pick).

Let 𝑓:𝔻→𝔻 be holomorphic. For all 𝑧1,𝑧2∈𝔻, let 𝑤1=𝑓(𝑧1) and 𝑤2=𝑓(𝑧2). Then,

|𝑤1−𝑤21−𝑤1𝑤2‾|≤|𝑧1−𝑧21−𝑧1𝑧2‾|.(3.5.3)

and

|d𝑤|1−|𝑤|2≤|d𝑧|1−|𝑧|2.(3.5.4)

The equalities hold iff 𝑓∈Aut(𝔻).

Proof.

Let

𝜑−𝑧1(𝑧)=𝑧+𝑧11+𝑧1‾𝑧∈Aut(𝔻),𝜑𝑤1(𝑧)=𝑧−𝑤11−𝑤1‾𝑧∈Aut(𝔻).

It follows that

𝜑𝑤1∘𝑓∘𝜑−𝑧1(0)=𝜑𝑤1(𝑤1)=0.

Then by the Schwarz Lemma (Lemma 3.5.1Lemma 3.5.1Lemma 3.5.1), for 𝑧∈𝔻,

|𝜑𝑤1∘𝑓∘𝜑−𝑧1(𝑧)|≤|𝑧|.

Let 𝑧2=𝜑−𝑧1(𝑧). Then,

|𝜑𝑤1∘𝑓(𝑧2)|≤|𝜑𝑧1(𝑧2)|⟺|𝜑𝑤1(𝑤2)|≤|𝜑𝑧1(𝑧2)|,

confirming (3.5.3)(3.5.3)(3.5.3). By the second statement of the Schwarz Lemma (Lemma 3.5.1Lemma 3.5.1Lemma 3.5.1), |(𝜑𝑤1∘𝑓∘𝜑−𝑧1)′(0)|≤1.

By the chain rule,

|𝜑(𝑤1)′(𝑤1)𝑓′(𝑧1)𝜑(−𝑧1)′(0)|≤1.

Let us now calculate the derivatives of 𝜑𝑤1 and 𝜑−𝑧1. By the quotient rule,

𝜑𝑤1′(𝑧)=1−𝑤1‾𝑤1(1−𝑤1‾𝑧)2,𝜑𝑤1′(𝑤1)=11−𝑤1‾𝑤1,

and

𝜑−𝑧1′(𝑧)=1−𝑧1‾𝑧1(1+𝑧1‾𝑧)2,𝜑−𝑧1′(0)=1−𝑧1‾𝑧1.

Since both derivatives are positive,

|𝑓′(𝑧1)|≤1−𝑤1‾𝑤11−𝑧1‾𝑧1.

Since 𝑧1∈𝔻 is arbitrary, it follows that

|d𝑤d𝑧|≤1−𝑤‾𝑤1−𝑧‾𝑧⟺|d𝑤|1−𝑤‾𝑤≤|d𝑧|1−𝑧‾𝑧.(3.5.5)

By the Schwarz Lemma (Lemma 3.5.1Lemma 3.5.1Lemma 3.5.1), under the equality condition that

|𝜑(𝑤1)′(𝑤1)𝑓′(𝑧1)𝜑(−𝑧1)′(0)|=1,

we have that

𝜑𝑤1∘𝑓∘𝜑−𝑧1=ei𝜏,

where 𝜏∈ℝ is constant. It follows that

𝑓=𝜑−𝑤1∘ei𝜏∘𝜑𝑧1∈Aut(𝔻).□

Remark.

In Section 8Section 8Section 8, we will introduce the hyperbolic metric on 𝔻, defined as

d𝑠2=4|d𝑧|2(1−|𝑧|2)2.
From (3.5.5)(3.5.5)(3.5.5), we get that the hyperbolic metric does in.notcrease under a holomorphic mapping of 𝔻 to itself. This metric is invariant (the equality condition) under all functions in Aut(𝔻). This gives a geometric explanation for Lemma 3.5.1Lemma 3.5.1Lemma 3.5.1.