Notes on Complex Analysis
Export PDFGitHub

§2.2.1 Wirtinger Derivatives

2.2.1 Wirtinger Derivatives

We have previously introduced the concept of expressing a complex function as a function of 𝑥 and 𝑦. It can also be expressed in terms of 𝑧 and 𝑧‾, where 𝑧=𝑥+i𝑦 and 𝑧‾=𝑥−i𝑦. Then |𝑧|2=𝑧𝑧‾, 𝑥=𝑧+𝑧‾2, and 𝑦=𝑧−𝑧‾2i. By the rules of the derivative, it is only natural that we define

𝜕𝜕𝑧=𝜕𝜕𝑥𝜕𝑥𝜕𝑧+𝜕𝜕𝑦𝜕𝑦𝜕𝑧=12(𝜕𝜕𝑥−i𝜕𝜕𝑦)(2.2.1.1)

and

𝜕𝜕𝑧‾=𝜕𝜕𝑥𝜕𝑥𝜕𝑧‾+𝜕𝜕𝑦𝜕𝑦𝜕𝑧‾=12(𝜕𝜕𝑥+i𝜕𝜕𝑦).(2.2.1.2)

If (2.2.1.1)(2.2.1.4)(2.2.1.1) is set equal to 0, then it is the equivalent form of the homogeneous Cauchy–Riemann Equations. Then for a holomorphic function 𝑓(𝑧), the Wirtinger derivative 𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑧=d𝑓d𝑧.

In terms of 𝑢 and 𝑣, the two derivatives of a function 𝑓(𝑧) are equal to:

𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑧=12(𝜕𝑢𝜕𝑥+i𝜕𝑣𝜕𝑥−i𝜕𝑢𝜕𝑦+𝜕𝑣𝜕𝑦),

and

𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑧‾=12(𝜕𝑢𝜕𝑥+i𝜕𝑣𝜕𝑥+i𝜕𝑢𝜕𝑦−𝜕𝑣𝜕𝑦).

If 𝑓 is holomorphic,

d𝑓d𝑧=𝜕𝑢𝜕𝑥+i𝜕𝑣𝜕𝑥=𝜕𝑣𝜕𝑦+i𝜕𝑣𝜕𝑥=𝜕𝑢𝜕𝑥−i𝜕𝑢𝜕𝑦=𝜕𝑣𝜕𝑦−i𝜕𝑢𝜕𝑦.(2.2.1.3)

On the contrary, by the rules of the derivative,

𝜕𝜕𝑥=𝜕𝜕𝑧𝜕𝑧𝜕𝑥+𝜕𝜕𝑧‾𝜕𝑧‾𝜕𝑥=𝜕𝜕𝑧+𝜕𝜕𝑧‾

and

𝜕𝜕𝑦=𝜕𝜕𝑧𝜕𝑧𝜕𝑦+𝜕𝜕𝑧‾𝜕𝑧‾𝜕𝑦=i𝜕𝜕𝑧−i𝜕𝜕𝑧‾.

The Laplacian is equal to

Δ=𝜕2𝜕𝑥2+𝜕2𝜕𝑦2=(𝜕𝜕𝑧+𝜕𝜕𝑧‾)2+(i𝜕𝜕𝑧−i𝜕𝜕𝑧‾)2=𝜕2𝜕𝑧2+𝜕2𝜕𝑧‾2+2𝜕2𝜕𝑧𝜕𝑧‾−𝜕2𝜕𝑧2−𝜕2𝜕𝑧‾2+2𝜕2𝜕𝑧𝜕𝑧‾=4𝜕2𝜕𝑧𝜕𝑧‾.(2.2.1.4)

Under this definition, we can derive the chain rule:

Theorem 2.2.1.1 (Chain Rule).

Let Ω⊆ℂ be a region such that 𝑔∈𝐶1(Ω) and 𝑓∈𝐶1(𝑔(Ω)). Writing 𝑤=𝑔(𝑧), it follows that

𝜕𝜕𝑧(𝑓∘𝑔)=(𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑤∘𝑔)𝜕𝑔𝜕𝑧+(𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑤‾∘𝑔)𝜕𝑔‾𝜕𝑧𝜕𝜕𝑧‾(𝑓∘𝑔)=(𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑤∘𝑔)𝜕𝑔𝜕𝑧‾+(𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑤‾∘𝑔)𝜕𝑔‾𝜕𝑧‾.
Proof.

Write 𝑧=𝑥+i𝑦. Let

𝑔(𝑧)=𝜉(𝑥,𝑦)+i𝜂(𝑥,𝑦),𝑤=𝜉+i𝜂

so that 𝑤=𝑔(𝑧) with 𝜉=𝜉(𝑥,𝑦),𝜂=𝜂(𝑥,𝑦). Let 𝑓 be regarded as a 𝐶1 function of the real variables 𝜉,𝜂; equivalently we may view 𝑓 as 𝑓(𝑤,𝑤‾) where 𝑤‾=𝜉−i𝜂. The composition is ℎ(𝑧)=𝑓∘𝑔(𝑧)=𝑓(𝜉(𝑥,𝑦),𝜂(𝑥,𝑦)).

Using the real chain rule (provided by the continuous differentiability), we have

𝜕ℎ𝜕𝑥=𝜕𝑓𝜕𝜉𝜕𝜉𝜕𝑥+𝜕𝑓𝜕𝜂𝜕𝜂𝜕𝑥,𝜕ℎ𝜕𝑦=𝜕𝑓𝜕𝜉𝜕𝜉𝜕𝑦+𝜕𝑓𝜕𝜂𝜕𝜂𝜕𝑦.

Hence,

𝜕ℎ𝜕𝑧=12[𝜕𝑓𝜕𝜉(𝜕𝜉𝜕𝑥−i𝜕𝜉𝜕𝑦)+𝜕𝑓𝜕𝜂(𝜕𝜂𝜕𝑥−i𝜕𝜂𝜕𝑦)].

Now recall

𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑤=12(𝜕𝑓𝜕𝜉−i𝜕𝑓𝜕𝜂),𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑤‾=12(𝜕𝑓𝜕𝜉+i𝜕𝑓𝜕𝜂).

Thus,

𝜕𝑓𝜕𝜉=𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑤+𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑤‾,𝜕𝑓𝜕𝜂=i(𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑤−𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑤‾).

Then by substitution,

𝜕ℎ𝜕𝑧=12[(𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑤+𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑤‾)(𝜕𝜉𝜕𝑥−i𝜕𝜉𝜕𝑦)+i(𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑤−𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑤‾)(𝜕𝜂𝜕𝑥−i𝜕𝜂𝜕𝑦)]=𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑤12[(𝜕𝜉𝜕𝑥−i𝜕𝜉𝜕𝑦)+i(𝜕𝜂𝜕𝑥−i𝜕𝜂𝜕𝑦)]+𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑤‾12[(𝜕𝜉𝜕𝑥−i𝜕𝜉𝜕𝑦)−i(𝜕𝜂𝜕𝑥−i𝜕𝜂𝜕𝑦)].

The terms in brackets equal 𝜕𝑔𝜕𝑧 and 𝜕𝑔‾𝜕𝑧. Thus,

𝜕ℎ𝜕𝑧=(𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑤∘𝑔)𝜕𝑔𝜕𝑧+(𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑤‾∘𝑔)𝜕𝑔‾𝜕𝑧.

A similar calculation using (2.2.1.2)(2.2.1.5)(2.2.1.2) gives

𝜕𝜕𝑧‾(𝑓∘𝑔)=(𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑤∘𝑔)𝜕𝑔𝜕𝑧‾+(𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑤‾∘𝑔)𝜕𝑔‾𝜕𝑧‾.

These are exactly the proclaimed identities. ⁠□

Last we have taking derivatives of conjugates:

Theorem 2.2.1.2.

Let 𝑓∈𝐶1(Ω) where Ω⊆ℂ is a region. Then

𝜕𝑓‾𝜕𝑧=(𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑧‾)‾,𝜕𝑓‾𝜕𝑧‾=(𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑧)‾.
Proof.

Write 𝑧=𝑥+i𝑦 and 𝑓(𝑧)=𝑢(𝑥,𝑦)+i𝑣(𝑥,𝑦) with 𝑢,𝑣∈𝐶1(Ω). Then 𝑓(𝑧)‾=𝑢(𝑥,𝑦)−i𝑣(𝑥,𝑦). We compute

𝜕𝑓‾𝜕𝑧=12(𝜕𝜕𝑥−i𝜕𝜕𝑦)(𝑢−i𝑣)=12(𝑢𝑥′−𝑣𝑦′−i(𝑣𝑥′+𝑢𝑦′)).

On the other hand,

𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑧‾=12(𝜕𝜕𝑥+i𝜕𝜕𝑦)(𝑢+i𝑣)=12(𝑢𝑥′−𝑣𝑦′+i(𝑣𝑥′+𝑢𝑦′)).

Taking complex conjugates yields

𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑧‾‾=12(𝑢𝑥′−𝑣𝑦′−i(𝑣𝑥′+𝑢𝑦′))=𝜕𝑓‾𝜕𝑧.

Similarly,

𝜕𝑓‾𝜕𝑧‾=12(𝜕𝜕𝑥+i𝜕𝜕𝑦)(𝑢−i𝑣)=12(𝑢𝑥′+𝑣𝑦′+i(𝑢𝑦′−𝑣𝑥′)),

while

𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑧=12(𝜕𝜕𝑥−i𝜕𝜕𝑦)(𝑢+i𝑣)=12(𝑢𝑥′+𝑣𝑦′+i(𝑣𝑥′−𝑢𝑦′)).

Taking complex conjugates gives

𝜕𝑓𝜕𝑧‾=12(𝑢𝑥′+𝑣𝑦′+i(𝑢𝑦′−𝑣𝑥′))=𝜕𝑓‾𝜕𝑧‾.□

As a final remark, we establish that the meaning of 𝐶𝑘(Ω) does not refer to the existence of a 𝑘-th order complex derivative, but rather the existence of continuous partial derivatives up to order 𝑘 in the real variables 𝑥 and 𝑦 (or equivalently, in terms of 𝑧 and 𝑧‾).